Diamonex Products
Diamonex® Products
DIAMONEX Home
Product Overview
About DIAMONEX Technology
News and Info
Contact Us
About Us
Quality Statement
Customer Questionnaire
Site Map
MAC Home

 

 

 
Wear Resistant Windows - AEGISGLASS PLUS® Valve Scanner Glass

SCANSHIELD® ]   AEGISGLASS PLUS® ]
EVERSCAN® ]   Performance Comparison ]
Product List ]    

Abrasion-Resistant Qualities of Diamond-Like Carbon (DLC) - Coated AEGISGLASS® for Laser Barcode Scanner Window Applications

Abstract

Historically, plexiglass, float glass, and tin oxide-coated glass have been used in horizontal laser barcode scanners. Scratching and abrasion of these windows results from contact with bottles and cans being passed over the scanner window. This scratching and abrasion reduces the performance of the scanner from first pass read rates near 100% for a new scanner window to first pass read rates of less than 50% for windows which are typically considered worn out.

Evaluations and experience has indicated that plexiglass windows have an economically useful life of approximately two weeks. Float glass should be replaced at approximately four-week intervals, and tin oxide-coated float glass may last eight weeks before scratching and haze results in significantly reduced performance.

DIAMONEX AEGISGLASS® is a diamond-like carbon (DLC)-coated glass. Diamond-like carbon has properties similar to those of diamond. In-store testing suggests that the lifespan of AEGISGlass is in excess of nine years of continuous duty in a busy checkout lane. This paper addresses the reduced efficiency which results from scratched windows and the often hidden cost which results from reduced performance of scanning equipment.

Introduction

Interest in scanner efficiency by retail organizations has grown considerably in the last decade. Grocery stores and mass merchandisers are closely studying the efficiency of repetitive scanning, since it directly corresponds with front-end register throughput and checkout line delay. In this paper, test results (in-store and laboratory) on each type of scanner window will be presented to show the relationship between wear and abrasion and scanner efficiency.

Experimental

Actual in-store observations and documentations of plexiglass, tin oxide-coated glass, conventional glass,and AEGISGLASS® (DLC-coated tempered float glass) wear-resistant qualities were tested at retail outlets in Illinois, New York, and eastern Pennsylvania. Data on the performance of each type of scanner window in the retail environment was evaluated by scanner operators, and front-end managers were interviewed.

Results and Discussion

Windows in supermarket, drug store, and mass merchandiser laser barcode scanners are subject to abrasion from impact and dragging of objects, such as metal cans, glass bottles, and ceramic items. The amount of abrasion experienced by a window is directly related to the number of items scanned. Scratches on a window can scatter the outgoing laser light. This scattering can defocus the laser beam and cause spatial resolution loss. This spatial resolution loss will produce difficulty in reading the barcode due to the beam being larger than the barcode lines. Scattering can also significantly reduce the laser beam intensity, which results in reflected signals that are too weak to be processed. In this application, the window protects the scanning equipment from the abuse of the checkout lane. The purpose of an abrasion-resistant coating is to stop or reduce the formation of scratches which cause significant loss of spatial resolution or power of the laser beam[1].

REFERENCE: [1] B. Knapp and F. Kimock, "Abrasion-resistant Diamond-Like Carbon (DLC) Films for Optical Applications", Technical Publications, March 25, 1992.

LABORATORY TESTING

A scanner window's resistance to scratching directly correlates to the useful life of the window. AEGISGLASS® was developed for use as windows in laser barcode scanners. For this application, AEGISGLASS® was required to be highly transparent at 632 and 680nm, substantially more abrasion-resistant than uncoated glass or tin oxide-coated glass, and resistant to cleaning solutions. In addition, the application of the DLC coating could not appreciably reduce the strength of the tempered glass substrate. All AEGISGLASS® had sufficient transmission at 632 and 680 nm, so that the performance of the scanner was not degraded. All AEGISGLASS® passed the Steam/Thermal Shock test. The DLC coatings were shown to be resistant to cleaning solutions used in supermarkets. In a series of tests in which heavy items were dropped onto the windows, the coating did not affect the breaking strength of the tempered glass substrate.

In abrasion testing, plexiglass, glass, and tin oxide-coated glass were rendered unusable after several passes of #600 diamond grit abrasive under 500gm load, while AEGISGLASS® was unaffected. Independent abrasion tests by major scanner manufacturers comparing samples of AEGISGLASS® to sapphire glass found AEGISGLASS® exhibited less haze than the sapphire glass after repeated exposure to a 500gm load on #600 diamond grit after 500 to 2000 abrasion strokes.

IN-STORE TESTING

During AEGISGLASS® development, in-store testing of various window materials was conducted over periods of several months to evaluate the performance of windows. The windows were installed in barcode scanners in 10 busy lanes in each of three grocery stores. The number of defects on each window was determined based on visual inspection of the number and length of scratches on the windows. Scratches which were obvious upon visual inspection were counted, since it was found that scratches which were not easily visible did not cause significant scattering of laser light.

In a busy lane (50,000 items/week) of a grocery store, an uncoated float glass window typically has a lifetime of 2-4 weeks. Uncoated float glass accumulates approximately one defect per several hundred items scanned. A normal tin oxide wear-resistant coating can extend the life of float glass to 8-12 weeks. Plexiglass, being the softest material used for barcode scanner windows, only has a lifetime expectancy of 1-2 weeks. In the first grocery store test, the accumulation rate of defects on the AEGISGLASS® windows, relative to uncoated float glass, predicted an expected average lifetime greater than 9 years in a busy lane.

In a second test, an in-store questionnaire was filled out by various store personnel concerning the plexiglass in their register scanning equipment. The cumulative results are demonstrated on the scanning glass questionnaire recap sheet (Table I.).

TABLE I. DIAMONEX scanning glass questionnaire recap.
1. Does your scanning glass become scratched or scuffed? Yes: 100%
No: 0%
2. When scratched, approximately how many re-scans are incurred each hour per register due to scratched/scuffed glass? 17.4
(avg.)
3. How often is your scanning glass replaced? 4-6
months
4. Do you see increased employee fatigue or frustration from having to re-scan? Yes: 100%
No: 0%
5. Have you noticed customers becoming annoyed (or even leaving the store) because of re-scanning due to scratched/scuffed glass? Yes: 57%
No: 43%
6. Have you been forced to open more registers due to poor performance of scratched/scuffed scanning glass? Yes: 43%
No: 57%
7. Would you be interested in scanning glass that cannot be scratched by anything in your store (JEWELRY STORES EXCLUDED)? Yes: 100%
No: 0%

Further observations were made to determine the relationship between scratch defects and re-scanning. This was done by observing store checkout personnel during normal scanning procedures. The re-scan survey chart (Table II.) directly correlates the amount of scuffing/scratching to the number of re-scans per hour.

TABLE II. Store re-scan survey chart.
STORE PLEXIGLASS CONDITION RE-SCANS PER HOUR
1 Light scuffing 12
1 Medium scuffing 66
1 Heavy scuffing 76
2 Light scuffing 8
2 Medium scuffing 36
2 Heavy scuffing 52
3 Light scuffing 4
3 Medium scuffing 32
3 Medium scuffing 44

AVERAGE RE-SCANNING PER HOUR AT THE REGISTERS OBSERVED:

AVERAGE RE-SCANNING PER HOUR AT THE REGISTERS OBSERVED:
Light scuffing: 8 Re-scans per hour
Medium scuffing: 42 Re-scans per hour
Heavy scuffing: 64 Re-scans per hour

Based on an average time of three seconds to re-scan an item, Table III depicts the cost of re-scanning at wages of $10 per hour (including benefits). With an average of six registers open, and providing the condition of the plexiglass is equally divided among light, medium, and heavy scuffing, a single store using the plexiglass windows observed could lose $3,420 per year from lost time due to re-scanning.

TABLE III. Re-scan cost chart.
X LIGHT SCUFFING MEDIUM SCUFFING HEAVY SCUFFING
Average re-scan at one register per hour due to scuffed/scratched glass surface 8 42 64
Average elapsed time for each re-scan 3 sec. 3 sec. 3 sec.
Total time per hour for re-scanning 24 sec. 126 sec. 192 sec.
Total time per six-hour day for re-scanning 144 sec. 756 sec. 1152 sec.
Total time x 300 workdays (converted to hours) 12 hrs. 63 hrs. 96 hrs.
X   x $10 hourly wage (including benefits)
Total annual dollars lost to re-scanning due to scuffed/scratched glass at each register $120 $630 $960

Similar observations were held by personnel at a store located in New York. In the endurance test, conventional glass, tin oxide-coated glass, and AEGISGLASS® were evaluated to determine the relative wear characteristics of each type of window under normal operating conditions. The goal of the evaluation was to quantify the superior performance of AEGISGLASS®. Table IV presents the extremely favorable results for AEGISGLASS®. During the test, both conventional glass and tin oxide-coated glass were scratched severely, and the AEGISGLASS® had virtually no signs of wear.

TABLE IV. Glass endurance tests.
TYPE OF SCANNER GLASS OBSERVATION
AEGISGLASS® No noticeable scratches
AEGISGLASS® No noticeable scratches
AEGISGLASS®* One very small scratch
Tin Oxide Noticeable scratches
Tin Oxide* Noticeable scratches
Tin Oxide Noticeable scratches
Conventional Glass Severe scratches
Conventional Glass Severe scratches
Conventional Glass Severe scratches
DEFINITIONS OF OBSERVATIONS:
  • Noticeable = Small scratches
  • Severe = Large and small scratches
  • No Noticeable = Couldn't see with the eye
*These lanes experience the highest level of usage.

Conclusions

Under normal retail store environments, plexiglass, tin oxide-coated glass, and conventional glass are but a short-term answer to the problem of abrasion, laser light scattering, and difficulty in barcode reading. AEGISGLASS® reduces re-scans, saves money, and has an expected life of eight to ten years of high quality, error-free scanner operation.


Products | About DIAMONEX Technology | News & Info | Contact Us | About Us | Home | Sitemap

DIAMONEX® Products
7331 William Avenue Allentown, PA 18106
Phone: 610-366-7100    Toll Free: 800-808-7101    Fax: 610-366-7144

 A Division of Morgan Advanced Ceramics
   Morgan Technical Ceramics is a Global Business Unit of the Morgan Crucible Company plc.
It comprises
Morgan Advanced Ceramics and Morgan Electro Ceramics.